Skip to main content

Translate

A new scientific review of 6,000 genetically modified corn studies in the last 21 years

Genetically modified crops have been criticized by environmental organizations for many years, although many studies have proven their safety. A new scientific review of about 6,000 genetically modified corn studies in the last 21 years shows that not only are genetically modified crops helping the environment, but they are also safer than 'natural' corn crops.

corn field and a tomato

The researchers found that the crop of genetically modified corn was 10 percent higher than the corresponding non-modified corn crop. The concentration of nutrients in the different species was the same, meaning that a farmer who sows genetically modified corn in his fields will receive a healthy and nutritious crop in 10 percent more of the "natural" species. The farmer will not have to expand his fields, invade protected forests or hit the environment to increase the crop - he can simply use genetically modified varieties to achieve the same goal. Thus, the use of genetically engineered corn helps preserve nature more than its natural counterparts. 

In contrast to the concerns raised in the past, genetically modified crops do not harm the biological diversity of the environment. Although certain species have been engineered to poison the insects that attack them, they do not harm other types of insects. Genetically engineered varieties are also healthier for humans because they contain lesser amounts of Mycotoxins.

What are Mycotoxins?

Well, these are carcinogenic toxins. They are secreted by fungi that attack the corn fairly routinely. The fungi are more successful in attacking the non - modified corn cobs, since they suffer more from insect attacks, and have difficulty dealing with the double onslaught of fungi. As a result, the natural corn contains larger amounts of Mycotoxins than that of the genetically engineered corn that is more resistant to insects - and, as a result, to fungi.

These results are valid only for genetically engineered corn, but they correspond to other similar findings in other genetically modified crops. So there is no surprise here for those who have been following the debate around genetically engineered crops in recent decades. "Genetic engineering" is just a buzzword for a variety of highly efficient technologies that allow us to engineer plants to give them certain properties. The older techniques for plant breeding were much more random - and as a result, they had always carried the fear of developing harmful mutations along the way.

Why genetic engineering is the best choice among the other bad alternatives?

The main advantage of genetic engineering over other cultivation methods - such as mutagenesis and the use of radiation, which is rarely mentioned in the media - is that in this method, the cultivator knows exactly what change he makes in fruit or vegetables, and where exactly this change is located. 

DNA is like a recipe book - every gene is a recipe, and there are mechanisms present in the cell that translate specific genes to attributes which are expressed in the organism. There is also a mechanism that identifies foreign DNA, a kind of 'liquidation list'. For example, if there is a disease that affects a certain crop and causes severe damage, genetic engineers might add this specific virus to the plant's "liquidation list", so that the cell would see it as a foreign body to be destroyed. In this way the plant becomes resistant to the disease. Thus, genetic engineering is the safest method to do this without affecting other traits in the plant.

In contrast to GM, other methods of cultivation that are used today, break the DNA into pieces. For example, the radiation method involves exposing the crops to radiation, such as gamma rays, to cause mutations. Of course, this method is unpredictable, the change is random, and out of a 1,000 varieties of the same plant the farmer might get only one that happened to come out well. Another method currently used is a method called Mutagenesis, in which a chemical is inserted into the DNA, where it disrupts a million different letters - such as spelling mistakes in a book. When the gene is inserted in the right place and in a controlled manner, engineers can control that the mutation will come out positive rather than random - that's genetic engineering. The other methods are looking for a random spelling error, out of a lot of bad mistakes.

What are the shortcomings of genetic engineering?

One of the claims against genetic engineering is that it causes overuse of herbicides: due to the herbicide-resistant gene more pesticides are used because once the plant is not at risk of the herbicides, the farmer tends to be less careful and use much more of the substance. In this context, the main concern is to produce herbivorous varieties that are resistant to the herbicide. The solution for this problem could be to use a different herbicide every year. Moreover, it's a problem not specific to genetic engineering; when farmers use the same substances again and again, regardless of GM, some plants will develop resistance.

Another concern is the "leakage" of genetically modified genes from the fields to the environment. This is a concern that exists in all cultivation methods, but the risk when employing GM methods is slightly higher. However, there is a solution to this problem as well; an American corporation has developed a gene that ensures that the seeds in which the gene was planted may breed, but their offspring will be sterile. In this way - even if the seed finds its way outside of the field, there is no danger that it will spread. This gene was banned because farmers resisted buying seeds that could not produce continuity. Prima facie, since a farmer who buys seeds from the corporation signs a contract that allows him to use the seeds during only one sowing cycle, this is a meaningless step, the only result of which could have been protecting nature from the "leakage" of genes that are foreign to it. 

Overall, GM has more benefits than shortcomings; we do not want to contaminate the land and groundwater with more chemicals. We want to be able to fight diseases and genetic damages, so that the plant will be resistant to them. All this requires intervention. The trick is to do it in a way that will do the least damage.



References:



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Amazon Forest On Fire 2019 (NASA Satellite Data)

With the 2019 fire season in the Amazon approaching its midpoint, scientists using NASA satellites to track fire activity have confirmed an increase in the number and intensity of fires in the Brazilian Amazon in 2019, making it the most active fire year in that region since 2010.Amazon forest on fire 2019
Fire activity in the Amazon varies considerably from year-to-year and month-to-month, driven by changes in economic conditions and climate. 
August 2019 stands out because it has brought a noticeable increase in large, intense, and persistent fires burning along major roads in the central Brazilian Amazon, explained Douglas Morton, chief of the Biospheric Sciences Laboratory at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center. 
While drought has played a large role in exacerbating fires in the past, the timing and location of fire detections early in the 2019 dry season are more consistent with land clearing than with regional drought.

“Satellites are often the first to detect fires burning in remo…

Wildlife Photographer of the Year 2019 (London's Natural History Museum's)

For more than fifty years this has actually drawn in the world's absolute best professional photographers, biologists and young professional photographers. 
There has actually never ever been a more vital time for audiences all over the world to experience our impactful and motivating exhibit," Tim Littlewood, Director of Science at the Natural History Museum.
50,000 entries from amateur and expert professional photographers throughout 100 nations were submitted to, of which the total winners will be revealed on October 15, 2019.

"Photography has a special capability to stimulate discussion, dispute and even action. 
After the awards event, the images will be shown at London's Natural History Museum from October 18 and will later on be showcased on a worldwide trip.
Credit: Eduardo Del Álamo/ Wildlife Professional Photographer of the Year 2019. A gentoo penguin flees for its life as a leopard seal break out of the water. 
Credit: Adrian Hirschi/Wildlife Photographer of the …

How Did They Tell Time Before Clocks?

Lets Examine How Did They Tell Time Before Clocks? Where Did Telling Time Originate?What makes time so important?Who invented the clockand why worldwide exist many various time zones?
The very first kind of telling time was the sundial and the earliest sundials are known from the archaeological record are obelisks from almost 5,000 years earlier. Sundials suggest the time by casting a shadow onto a surface. The things that cast the shadow is a stick in the center known as a gnomon. A sound sundial can determine time with exceptional precision, and sundials were used to monitor the efficiency of clocks until the modern period.

However, sundials have their limitations too. Undoubtedly they require the sun to shine, They do not work throughout the night when it's dark. 
Several devices have been utilized throughout the years to estimate the passage of time. candle lights and sticks of incense that burn down at fairly predictable speeds have been used, in addition to the hourglass.

Hou…

18 photos documenting the consequences of the Chernobyl disaster

On April 26, 1986, a nuclear reactor in the territory of Ukraine, which was then part of the former Soviet Union, failed. As a result of that severe systemic failure, the reactor core was melted, and radioactive materials released from it were scattered everywhere, first to the environment close to the reactor, and then to almost every continent in Europe.  As a result , thousands of people have been killed - either directly or indirectly.  At the time, such a scenario might sound like science fiction, but today we all know that this happened in reality, at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant near the city ofPripyat in northwestern Ukraine , and the case is known as the Chernobyl disaster. 
In fact, this nuclear accident has been considered the most serious of its kind since they began using nuclear energy, and to date there is a ban on humans entering the area within a radius of 30 km from the reactor's whereabouts. 
Romain veillon, revealing the horrific ruins of the city of Pripyat, …

A new automated system that is capable of producing organs from stem cells

Organoids: mini organs in a petri dish for disease research and new curesA new automated system developed at the University of Washington is capable of efficiently producing mini organs from stem cells, and thereby has the potential to accelerate biomedical science and research.

Normally, when a researcher wants to test medications or treatments on cells from a particular tissue - for example, a liver - he should first grow the cells in the laboratory in a petri dish. The cells grow on the bottom of the dish and form a thin two-dimensional tissue that does not reflect what happens in the complex three-dimensional tissue that exists in the body. In recent years, researchers have been able to make stem cells develop into three-dimensional structures more like those in the body, called mini-organs. Researchers are able to test different treatments for the mini-organs, and to be more confident that they actually reflect what happens in the living body.

But there is one big problem: produci…

Wide Field Infrared Survey Telescope Mission and Key Technologies (WFIRST space telescope)

Wide field infrared survey telescope is designed to answer big questions about the universe:  What is dark energy, which seems to be speeding up The expansion of the universe? How many planets exist among the Stars, and what are they like?  WFIRST is similar to Hubble, but benefits from 30 years of technological development. It will view the sky on a scale never before accomplished from space.
The Primary mirror This is where WFIRST is closest to Hubble. The same size and type of main mirror, a 2.4-meter precisely shaped piece of silver-coated glass.  The size of this mirror is partly how WFIRST matches Hubble’s resolution.
Wide Field Instrument 
The Wide field infrared survey telescope main camera is the Wide Field Instrument which will take infrared pictures of the sky to study dark energy, observe galaxies and stars, and find exoplanets. 
Instead of Hubble’s single first-generation image sensor, the WFI incorporates 18 third-generation chips that allow it to take pictures capturing 100 tim…

Moon’s gamma-ray glow from NASA’s Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope

Steadily improving view of the Moon’s gamma-ray glow from NASA’s Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope. Each 5-by-5-degree image is centered on the Moon and shows gamma rays with energies above 31 million electron volts, or tens of millions of times that of visible light. 
At these energies, the Moon is actually brighter than the Sun. Brighter colors indicate greater numbers of gamma rays. This image sequence shows how longer exposure, ranging from two to 128 months (10.7 years), improved the view.
If our eyes could see high-energy radiation called gamma rays, the Moon would appear brighter than the Sun! That’s how NASA’s Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope has seen our neighbor in space for the past decade.

Gamma-ray observations are not sensitive enough to clearly see the shape of the Moon’s disk or any surface features. Instead, Fermi’s Large Area Telescope (LAT) detects a prominent glow centered on the Moon’s position in the sky.

Scientists have been analyzing the Moon’s gamma-ray glow as a way…

Floating City - Life on an Aircraft Carrier

Life on an Aircraft Carrier During the United States War in Iraq (April 2003), we landed for a few days on American aircraft carrier Harry S. Truman, who sailed in Mediterranean waters somewhere off the Syrian coast.

We wanted to be impressed by how more than 5,000 men and women in this flooding town functioned for months on end in loneliness, disconnected from the home environment, family, and friends. 

Airplanes took off all the way to Iraq, thousands of people were busy with their missions, and we roamed the narrow, elongated "streets" of the huge ship, descended and climbed between its floors.

The aircraft carrier is capable of satisfying its needs for an extended period of time, from the almost unlimited cruise capacity provided by its two nuclear reactors to high-quality food, entertainment and leisure services, as only a developed Western army offers. 

The ship has, for example, dozens of dining rooms and buffets, a department store, postal services, telephone and internet…

Two T-38s traveling faster than the speed of sound (shock waves visible)

To get the image, NASA utilized a Super King Air turboprop airplane flying at an indicated airspeed of about 160 miles per hour at 30,000 feet. 

The two supersonic jets, separated by about 30 feet front to back and 10 feet vertically, were listed below the King Air by about 2,000 feet when it shot the images. 
The shock waves were photographable because of the modification in air density. "The density modification triggers a modification in the index of refraction," Banks states. A spoon will look distorted when you see it immersed in a glass of water. 
It turns out that images of shockwaves triggered by flying faster than the speed of sound are amazing to see, even without the sound. 

NASA photographed 2 T-38 airplanes flying at merely faster than the speed of sound over California. The King Air has ports on its stomach that can be opened or closed, and the photography equipment was placed in among those ports so it might shoot downwards. 
The turboprop doing the shooting was st…

Stanford Prison Experiment Response bias, Are the conclusions valid?

Stanford Prison ExperimentAlmost 50 years after the Stanford Prison Experiment (zimbardo), which is considered one of the milestones in behavioral psychology, it turns out that much of it was fake. Conclusions about stanford prison experiment.
"How we went about testing these questions and what we found in the stanford experiment (philip zimbardo) may astound you. Our planned two-week investigation into the psychology of prison life had to be ended after only six days because of what the situation was doing to the college students who participated. In only a few days, Inour prison experiment guards became sadistic and our prisoners became depressed and showed signs of extreme stress".
This is how Philip Zimbardo summed up the experiment. In 1971, it was one of the most recognized psychological experiments in the world. Its findings were extensively covered in the media and influenced the perception of many in terms of the role of prisons, the source of criminal behavior and th…